tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3130650256161013147.post2952006214654718837..comments2024-02-16T05:28:21.518-05:00Comments on Creative Juices: Ditch DigitalBob Flynnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13053411253123465715noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3130650256161013147.post-89196120534091395962009-02-03T08:50:00.000-05:002009-02-03T08:50:00.000-05:00Wow. It's nice to read an article supporting handd...Wow. It's nice to read an article supporting handdrawn animation. <BR/>I don't see that being much of a feasibility though. Meaning, I'd sure be pleasantly surprised if it were true- but, I just can't imagine that happening. Plus... that would be bad news for a lot of folks who've made their livings making digital animation.<BR/>I'm glad Floyd Norman emphasizes that he's not computer bashing- and tries to explain what the buisness choice was. Though, isn't is cheaper to make a digital animation? And since Disney is a buisness, their goal is making money.<BR/>This line was what stuck out to me the most, "It’s all about whether the stories are any good; whether the characters resonate with an audience." Thank goodness someone had the gall to say it aloud. What a sigh of relief. The way I see it though, most parents are going to take their kid to see whatever new movie is out whether it has a good messege or not. I know how pessimistic that sounds... but who doesn't know parents who plop their tots in front of a crappy movie just to get an hour of silence. I don't have a kid, so I get to say things like that. <BR/>I do want to see more handdrawn animation, but there's no reason that both can't exist under the same studios name. Bring more animators in. I have no background in buisness, so what do I really know- but it seems to me that they would make money from doing both.Sunny Day Print Co.https://www.blogger.com/profile/04962269717395354286noreply@blogger.com